From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5506c2365bd40ef5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: David Botton <David@Botton.com>
Subject: Re: gdb fails unders win95?
Date: 1999/05/25
Message-ID: <374B5779.A93E4855@Botton.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 482141898
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <7i620s$cp5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <ubtf8n9f2.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gate.net
X-Trace: news.gate.net 927684483 24972 199.227.148.84 (26 May 1999 02:08:03
 GMT)
Organization: CyberGate, Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 1999 02:08:03 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-26T02:08:03+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Why not?

Stephen Leake wrote:
> gdb has not yet been taught how to understand Microsoft debugging
> format, and probably never will.