From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f495c7652c09dd8c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jmarten@ibm.net (Jean-Marten Marchi)
Subject: Re: Does this model work ?
Date: 1999/05/14
Message-ID: <374686a0.3798481@news2.ibm.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 477937404
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <373e38e2.31311363@news2.ibm.net>
 <373C5244.3A16F5B8@easystreet.com>
X-Trace: 14 May 1999 20:31:46 GMT, 139.92.73.236
Organization: IBM Global Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services
X-Notice: should be reported to postmaster@ibm.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: postmaster@ibm.net
Date: 1999-05-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 14 May 1999 09:41:40 -0700, Al Christians
<achrist@easystreet.com> wrote:

>With machines at 300 Mhz and up becoming
>common,the differences between fast and slow compilations isn't even
>noticeable for non-huge programs, so other languages should be able to
>play the same game, too.

I think so, and maybe, with GNAT, you could download only the output
of GNAT to the gcc compiler?