From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bcdac28207102750
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: Ada95 speed
Date: 1999/05/20
Message-ID: <374430d4.2941633@news.pacbell.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 480163410
References: <374182F2.B10AD449@Maths.UniNe.CH>
 <3741aa37.3892645@news.pacbell.net> <3741B203.4890880B@Maths.UniNe.CH>
 <7ht4ss$4mu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3743D5BB.37152F94@gte.net>
 <3744141A.73D7A4D2@averstar.com> <37442782.554319@news.pacbell.net>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net 927216018 207.214.211.206 (Thu,
 20 May 1999 09:00:18 PDT)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 09:00:18 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>comparable speed on my Pentium 200
Sorry, I should have been more specific.
The 1200x700, 64 Iteration max, program runs in 3.3 seconds on a P200
with just one other (the message loop) task, plus Win95 background,
running.  I compiled it with just the -O4 optimization option and did
not turn off checking (which doesn't seem to make much difference).