From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f495c7652c09dd8c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jmarten@ibm.net (Jean-Marten Marchi)
Subject: Re: Does this model work ?
Date: 1999/05/16
Message-ID: <373eaad8.778689@news2.ibm.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 478438832
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <373e38e2.31311363@news2.ibm.net> <7hhj6q$cjn$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <01be9ee1$eca9be10$022a6282@dieppe>
X-Trace: 16 May 1999 11:40:52 GMT, 139.92.73.53
Organization: IBM Global Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services
X-Notice: should be reported to postmaster@ibm.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: postmaster@ibm.net
Date: 1999-05-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 15 May 1999 10:56:36 -0400, "Pascal Obry"
<pascal_obry@csi.com> wrote:

>Ada sources are very portable byte-code, you just have to let it go through
>the Ada virtual machine (compiler+linker) et Voil� :-)

Well, i think it's not very appropriate to name it a Virtual Machine
because, in this case, it has nothing virtual. And this is the real
advantage. No need of a VM. 

But, maybe you could elaborate why Ada is so much portable. There are
surely some reasons.