From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f495c7652c09dd8c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) Subject: Re: Does this model work ? Date: 1999/05/16 Message-ID: <373e206f.15820932@news.pacbell.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 478335177 References: <373e38e2.31311363@news2.ibm.net> <373C5244.3A16F5B8@easystreet.com> <374a882a.4192147@news2.ibm.net> <87u2teypil.fsf@bglbv.my-dejanews.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net 926818519 207.214.211.82 (Sat, 15 May 1999 18:35:19 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 18:35:19 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-05-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >Perhaps awareness of IBM's Virtual Machine/Conversational Monitor System >(VM/CMS) was more widespread at the time... "Virtual Machine" (with >capital V and M) might even enjoy trademark status for all I know. I doubt it. Virtual Machine was certainly common parlance in the late 1960s and I'm fairly sure I remember using "Virtual IO Channel" in a document in 1963-4.