From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e5c102037393131
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com>
Subject: Re: Assertions
Date: 1999/05/12
Message-ID: <3739F062.14D9196A@averstar.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 477162499
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: houdini.burl.averstar.com
References: <3736D243.1EEBF1AB@globalnet.co.uk> <3736F549.E3DDCDEB@pwfl.com>
 <7h83lc$rd$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3739CECA.6A49865B@averstar.com>
 <1999May12.163911.1@eisner.decus.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: AverStar (formerly Intermetrics)  Burlington, MA  USA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Larry Kilgallen wrote:

> ...
> I would have expected:
> 
>     if NOT boolean_expression then

So would I ;-).  Well, as I said, it was a strawman...

> since I would expect to say:
> 
>     pragma Assert(Expression_I_Expect_To_Be_True);

Yes, definitely, make that "if NOT boolean_expression then ..."

> Larry Kilgallen

-- 
-Tucker Taft   stt@averstar.com   http://www.averstar.com/~stt/
Technical Director, Distributed IT Solutions  (www.averstar.com/tools)
AverStar (formerly Intermetrics, Inc.)   Burlington, MA  USA