From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,37a004cb543745e2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Paul Channell <paulc@lanl.gov>
Subject: Re: ada debugger
Date: 1999/05/03
Message-ID: <372DD36D.36037E0D@lanl.gov>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 473560968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <372B1317.6477DFA2@santandersupernet.com>
 <m3ogk4zm09.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990502223948.106368B-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>
 <7giuca$rf3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@lanl.gov
X-Trace: newshost.lanl.gov 925750125 24021 128.165.34.99 (3 May 1999 16:48:45
 GMT)
Organization: LANL
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 May 1999 16:48:45 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-03T16:48:45+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote:

> In article
> <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990502223948.106368B-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.
> il>,
>   Ehud Lamm <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> > My students don't like gdb, being mostly with PC background etc.
> >
> > Does there exist some debugger that is friendlier?
> >
> > Ehud Lamm     mslamm@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il
>
> How could anyone possibly know the answer to this question if you
> don't give some idea of what you find unfriendly about GDBTK!
> People have all sorts of ideas about what they want in debuggers.
> Discussion of these ideas is fruitful, but a general message like
> the one above is not helpful!
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

  Where are sources for gdbtk? I use linux on a powerpc and would have to
recompile
to use it.