From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7d533acec91ae16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Geert Bosch Subject: Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95 Date: 1999/04/29 Message-ID: <372894AF.920FC8ED@gnat.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 472371516 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7g2qu4$ca4$1@usenet.rational.com> <7g3b5g$p92$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7g4ae3$hjh2@ftp.kvaerner.com> <7g4mk7$upg$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3726A2B1.5793E3BE@rocketmail.com> <7g6upj$v5c$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3727EC39.E460C803@rocketmail.com> <7g9r16$gll$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> To: Robert Dewar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: WinStar NorthWest Nexus Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: If I remember correctly, "not" is defined as the Base-1 complement of the value. So "not 4" in a modulo 13 type would be 8. I'm not positive that this is right though, but it is the only reasonable definition I can think of... Robert Dewar wrote: > Now, *without* going to the Ada RM, let's see if we can > remember exactly what's going on with the etc here. Hands > up those who remember how NOT works on non-binary modular > types (hint: the above quote is wrong wrt NOT :-)