From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7d533acec91ae16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Corey Ashford Subject: Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95 Date: 1999/04/28 Message-ID: <3726A2B1.5793E3BE@rocketmail.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 471771994 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7g2qu4$ca4$1@usenet.rational.com> <7g3b5g$p92$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7g4ae3$hjh2@ftp.kvaerner.com> <7g4mk7$upg$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Rational Software Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > > In article <7g4ae3$hjh2@ftp.kvaerner.com>, > "Tarjei Tj stheim Jensen" > wrote: > > I think the person who asked the question whould have > > preferred something that was inline instead of a function > > call. At least that would _look_ efficient. > > Perhaps you were missing a smiley here, but assuming this > comment is a serious one, of COURSE intrinsic functions > are generated inline, that's the whole point of them! > > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own I tried out this technique, by the way, on Apex. Works like a champ and inlines exactly as you said. Many thanks for your help, Robert. This cleaned up my code nicely and got rid of some preprocessor code. - Corey