From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,590b710e61b9ddf8,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.241.37 with SMTP id wf5mr10306780pbc.4.1329154892539;
        Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni20848pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?B?TG9uZyBIb8OgbmcgxJDDrG5o?= <long.hdi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Concurrency always is non-deterministic?
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <3721724.784.1329154891821.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcwt9>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.30.87.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1329154892 12361 127.0.0.1 (13 Feb 2012 17:41:32
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:41:32 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=123.30.87.3;
 posting-account=paWW-woAAABZ2b_q4k_Ldv6hEcjqv5lX
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-02-13T09:41:31-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

The author of this post said so. If Ada were non-deterministic at concurrency, I guess it couldn't be real-time, right?

http://ghcmutterings.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/parallelism-concurrency/

Please let me know your opinions about that post.