From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ca953bf7d2d90db X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) Subject: Re: Looking for bindings Date: 1999/04/23 Message-ID: <37209a26.493289@news.pacbell.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 470023342 References: <37204A94.9EFAAD@xtra.co.nz> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net 924883832 206.170.24.59 (Fri, 23 Apr 1999 09:10:32 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 09:10:32 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >All of them together would be best but either of WinSock or Zip would >do. Claw (www.rrosftware.com) has a thick Winsock binding that runs with ObjectAda and Gnat, among others. (I wrote it.) >(not the free >downloadable) version But I don't believe they are part of the no-charge downloadable demo version. >but to reimplement all those bindings from scratch would account for >well over 99% of the >total effort Sounds like you may need to spend either effort or money.