From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ca2a48dd8ded0e5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) Subject: Re: minimal hardware for ada (newbie) Date: 1999/04/09 Message-ID: <370e6571.136518@news.pacbell.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 464561232 References: <370d1d3c.9231283@news.hrz.uni-kassel.de> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: typhoon-sf.pbi.net 923690427 206.170.2.14 (Fri, 09 Apr 1999 13:40:27 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 13:40:27 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >The "smallest" processor I found was a 386. Are 16- >or even 8-bit processors supported, too? Certainly there were Ada 83 compilers targetted to 16 bit 8086 embedded systems. I haven't kept up to date with more recent stuff though.