From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7d6c5fa158a384aa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Steve Quinlan Subject: Re: Another Ada success story Date: 1999/04/07 Message-ID: <370B5B48.D94CEA52@nospam.lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 463629737 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7edh9d$93l$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Lockheed-Martin Air Traffic Management Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: gbooker@acm.org wrote: > For those not yet aware of it, the Federal Aviation Administration has > another Ada success story to share. Considering I've spent most of the last 5 years working on the DSR project (and before that on its predecessor), the kudos are appreciated. Yes, Ada is now helping run the En Route Air Traffic Control system. First site to go fully operational was Seattle. Others will be coming online in the next year or so. Next up (for us at Lockheed Martin Air Traffic Managment) will be our first Ada 95 project. Based on a prototype written in C and PL/I by MITRE, the "Conflict Probe" system we are developing gives controllers more new HW and SW to see predicted positions of aircraft up to 20 min. into the future, get graphical indications on trajectories when those predicted positions get too close, and gives graphical tools to aid in planning aircraft course changes to avoid the "loss of separation" (Air Traffic Control term for planes getting closer than minimum standards allow). Very cool stuff. Steve Quinlan