From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1ff5003422436e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-05 21:11:26 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!lab.ultra.nyu.edu!kenner From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Easily-Read C++? Date: 5 Oct 1994 22:23:18 GMT Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab Message-ID: <36v90m$9r4@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> References: <941005030023_73672.2025_DHR103-1@CompuServe.COM> <36v7p4$amf@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lab.ultra.nyu.edu Date: 1994-10-05T22:23:18+00:00 List-Id: In article <36v7p4$amf@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: >Right, and comments also slow down you reading because they add unnecessary >characters .. I certainly know far too many programmers who think that >way ... There are actually times when it can! Consider the following fragment of an assembler language program for the PDP-11 written by someone who was told to write a comment on every line: ADD #1,R0 ;Add one to R0. That actually *does* slow down reading! One company, either DEC (I think) or CDC (less likely) actively discouraged this sort of thing in their coding standard.