From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a8985ede8fe3d111
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-05 14:44:35 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!sgiblab!gatekeeper.us.oracle.com!barrnet.net!rational.com!rlk
From: rlk@rational.com (Bob Kitzberger)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada compared to C++
Date: 5 Oct 1994 18:20:01 GMT
Organization: Rational Software Corp
Message-ID: <36uqoh$pu9@rational.rational.com>
References: <milodCwwqMy.CK@netcom.com> <36h4pc$9dd@starbase.neosoft.com>
 <cppCx20IA.Anx@netcom.com> <36msgr$qq2@starbase.neosoft.com>
 <cppCx50GD.G0y@netcom.com> <36thvr$m3d@rational.rational.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bonnie.rational.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: 1994-10-05T18:20:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bob Kitzberger (rlk@rational.com) flubbed:

: My suspicion, though, is that the real problem for C++ or Ada viz-a-viz
                                                                ^^^^^^^^^
: portability is the use of external frameworks -- class libraries, GUI

Gack.  Misspelled, and an innapropriate usage as well.  Please substitute
"with regard to".

	.B.