From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3f02741d8aff850b,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-04 13:43:46 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news.cerf.net!hacgate2.hac.com!samson!dschwepk
From: dschwepk@samson.hac.com (Daniel Schwepker)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: ClearCase and Ada -- Config. Management
Date: 30 Sep 1994 17:55:32 GMT
Organization: Hughes Training Incorporated, WCO
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <36hjek$18k@hacgate2.hac.com>
Reply-To: dschwepk@samson.hac.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: samson-hti.hac.com
Date: 1994-09-30T17:55:32+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Currently we are using ClearCase for Configuration Management on an SGI
platform. This works well for C and Fortran code. Ada is a different
matter. ClearCase has its own intelligent make utility, Clearmake, that
keeps track of timestamps and dependencies on its own. Rational Ada
also keeps track of its own timestamps and dependencies, as it has to.
When I put Ada under ClearCase control, Clearmake always will rebuild
every Ada compilation unit every time. But if I only use a.make, I do
not get the advantages of ClearCase sharing object files between users,
or users being able to work in separate "views". Is anybody currently
developing Ada under ClearCase? What contortions have you had to go 
through?

Daniel