From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fedc2d05e82c9174
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: Ada 83 - Sometimes still chosen
Date: 1999/03/26
Message-ID: <36fbd5af.872257@news.pacbell.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 459436490
References: <auWJ2.6969$2G6.3578@c01read02.service.talkway.com>
 <87aex3pue4.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <36F913E0.75F51763@lmco.com>
 <7dbcj3$e0l@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> <7dbvl2$5bl$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <7dc9ld$2u6@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com> <7dfqr1$g5j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: typhoon-sf.pbi.net 922473975 206.170.2.36 (Fri,
 26 Mar 1999 10:46:15 PDT)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:46:15 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-03-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>sometimes the use of obsolete
>equipment is the right solution
As I think somebody pointed out, a better word in this case is
"obsolescent" meaning "becoming obsolete".