From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca0d61d183eeb881 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) Subject: Re: Direct memory access Date: 1999/03/25 Message-ID: <36fa8f0e.6212108@news.pacbell.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 459061223 References: X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: typhoon-sf.pbi.net 922390532 206.170.24.57 (Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:35:32 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:35:32 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > package Byte_Conversions is new > System.Address_To_Access_Conversions (Byte); Why not use System.Storage_Elements? If he wants to write a RAM test program, presumably he wants to access all memory and know the addresses, which would appear to be what System.Storage_Elements is about, no? > you must have permission from the OS to access the memory and be able to see physical, not virtual, addresses.