From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,cdd9bdc1ad5bb2e9 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.199.73 with SMTP id ji9mr1781758pbc.5.1327169097712; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:04:57 -0800 (PST) Path: lh20ni208141pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: jpwoodruff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question about the "ada coin" Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:59:32 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <36f6ecf9-140e-491e-82e3-f9009d094263@o4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> References: <8522978.2131.1327072508716.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbcw9> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.4.11.62 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1327169097 30628 127.0.0.1 (21 Jan 2012 18:04:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.4.11.62; posting-account=eLk0BgoAAAA-yA75xm1L7heSizMaESVg User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-01-21T09:59:32-08:00 List-Id: On Jan 20, 1:20=A0pm, d...@vana.cs.kuleuven.be. (Dirk Craeynest) wrote: <...> > > >(Oh, BTW, it will need some updating with "2012") > > Yes, indeed. =A0It's on my "to do" list, unless someone beats me to it. > The idea is to recreate the "Ada coin" picture using a good quality > version of the "Lady Ada" image, add "2012", and then make it available > on the Internet. Would you mind a suggestion? 1983 .. 2012 at the bottom seems kind-of cool. And it will be easy to revise as specifications change. John PS I'd offer, except I have no useful skill.