From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,4215feeab2a8154a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: REH <spamjunk@stny.rr.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++0x and Threads - a poor relation to Ada's tasking model?
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <36e462fe-cb9b-4fd0-9c68-88b5e998e942@j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
References: <wcc8whovk76.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <850893f5-46e5-443f-af0f-f16eef5cfa37@n2g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
	<hm5885t02rttpp8lppg5gtib804at4tca8@4ax.com>
 <ea76ae4c-11c2-4986-ab72-78f5ece43a76@p36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
	<v7ha85hhe7d4npss2r4974s6kbv41jq1gh@4ax.com>
 <57766742-5e6e-4b68-8094-57db1fa8951d@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>
	<2kra85p2lsrd7200mcfr9fn65s123468br@4ax.com>
 <625c577b-9097-4a8d-a9cb-dd986dd81f89@h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
	<fhua85diml8s6bq53e6t6435j00of7kc3l@4ax.com>
 <d223de57-6494-4946-8382-68bb95bb340e@d4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
	<wcc7hx6utg7.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <776704ff-2531-47f7-8949-7cca4cf4b4f1@o35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>
	<wcc8whmt49t.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.205.133.144
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1250298922 27005 127.0.0.1 (15 Aug 2009 01:15:22
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:15:22 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.205.133.144;
	posting-account=GwkXCgoAAABFSG45Q--uHVZG6zn6ec-e
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.0.11)
	Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7811
Date: 2009-08-14T18:15:20-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Aug 14, 6:33=A0pm, Robert A Duff <bobd...@shell01.TheWorld.com>
wrote:
> REH <spamj...@stny.rr.com> writes:
> >http://www.ddj.com/cpp/201001318
>
> Thanks for the link.
>
> > Please don't be too critical. It's my first article, and I am by no
> > means an Ada expert!
>
> Not at all critical. =A0I read it. =A0I have no criticisms, I think it's =
a
> nice demonstration of C++ templates.
>
> Of course, a real Ada compiler can use data-flow analysis to remove even
> more checks than your templates can. =A0But that's not a criticism of you=
r
> C++ templates.
>
> Nice job! =A0I found your article interesting!
>

Thanks. I thought my Ada terminology might be wrong. I had it peer
review by C++ experts, but not Ada. I used the term "ranged types." I
thought I read later (here I think) that is technically not correct.

REH