From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cef1e23795181e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) Subject: Re: Alternate to Unchecked_Conversion - Portable? Date: 1999/02/26 Message-ID: <36d64ce3.10597940@news.pacbell.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 448631180 References: <36d05e39.0@news.pacifier.com> <36d2638e.6427631@nntp.concentric.net> <7avpi0$jke$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36d3ba85.713118@nntp.concentric.net> <7b2l6s$vu3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36d50d18.695962@nntp.concentric.net> <7b3glh$ml6$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7b49m5$eet$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36d65c7c.15971534@nntp.concentric.net> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: typhoon-sf.pbi.net 920014135 206.170.2.251 (Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:28:55 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:28:55 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >Maybe the Unchecked_Conversion of access types has >wider approval from those who develop language standards. There's RM 13.9(13) "An implementation may place restrictions on Unchecked_Conversion." to worry about, of course.