From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,47def5aa7b3182bd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: How to write TYPECASE in Ada 95?
Date: 1999/02/17
Message-ID: <36cb2712.1390453@news.pacbell.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 445459745
References: <79fct8$9k3$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
 <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902051123560.3807-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <1103_918264881@DZOG-CHEN>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: typhoon-sf.pbi.net 919283471 206.170.2.115 (Wed,
 17 Feb 1999 12:31:11 PDT)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 12:31:11 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dispatching is certainly better than a case statement - if you use it.

Consider an existing package of the form:

package Grocer is
  type Fruit is abstract tagged ...
  type Apple is new Fruit ...
  ...
  type Watermelon is new Fruit ...
  ...
  function Best(Budget : in Money) return Fruit'class;
end Grocer;

And now you are writing a new package which, among other things, does

with Grocer;
 use Grocer;
package Meal is
  procedure Serve(Dish : in Apple);
  ...
  procedure Serve(Dish : in Watermelon);
end Meal;

Suppose a user wants, not unreasonably, to write
...
   Meal.Serve(Dish => Grocer.Best(Budget=>1.00));

Unless you can go back and modify Grocer, it appears you must include
in Meal
  procedure Serve_Fruit(Dish : in Fruit'class);
with a body like
  procedure Serve_Fruit(Dish : in Fruit'class) is
  begin
    if Dish in Apple'class then Serve(Apple(Dish));
    ...
    elsif Dish in Watermelon'class then Serve(Watermelon(Dish));
    else raise Heck;
    end if;
  end Serve_Fruit;

Is there a better way?