From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d121cc76e012fcca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Steve Doiel" <nospam_steved@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Library Level Question
Date: 1999/02/16
Message-ID: <36ca3e87.0@news.pacifier.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 445637445
References: <36c853cb.0@news.pacifier.com> <m3lnhztu9w.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <36c8d860.0@news.pacifier.com> <7aam8p$g7i@drn.newsguy.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Trace: 16 Feb 1999 19:59:03 PST, 216.65.138.220
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>>If I understand correctly, your example is in slight error in that package
>>Diagram is at the library level, but its contents are not.
>>
>
>huh?
>
>package diagram is NOT at library level. That is the whole point of
>the example!
>

Back to the example, with a couple of procedures added:

package Book is

  procedure Read is
  begin
  end Read;

  package Diagram is

    procedure Draw ...
  ...
  end Diagram;

...
end Book;

In this example the procedure "Read" is a the library level and the
procedure "Draw" is not at the library level.  Any declarations between
"procedure Read" and "end Read" are not at the library level (only the
interface is at the library level).  Similarly anything between "package
Diagram" and "end Diagram" is not at the library level, but the interface is
at the library level.

Suppose the diagram package were made a generic.  I could create an instance
of the generic since it is at the library level, but I could not see inside
the generic.

If I'm off base, let me know.

SteveD