From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d121cc76e012fcca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Steve Doiel" <nospam_steved@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Library Level Question
Date: 1999/02/15
Message-ID: <36c8d860.0@news.pacifier.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 444797741
References: <36c853cb.0@news.pacifier.com> <m3lnhztu9w.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Trace: 15 Feb 1999 18:30:56 PST, 216.65.137.137
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>But if we have a package inside another, like this:
>
>package Book is
>
>  package Diagram is
>
>  ...
>  end Diagram;
>
>...
>end Book;
>
>
>then the inner package is _not_ at library level.  The diagram is in the
>book, not the library.
>

Thank you, I believe the concept of library level is clear to me now.

If I understand correctly, your example is in slight error in that package
Diagram is at the library level, but its contents are not.

SteveD