From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-05 16:07:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: britt@adapower.net (Britt Snodgrass) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0 Date: 5 Oct 2001 16:06:59 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <36c6f8dd.0110051506.3fdabae0@posting.google.com> References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0110041038.5c321817@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.253.238.30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1002323220 17454 127.0.0.1 (5 Oct 2001 23:07:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Oct 2001 23:07:00 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13818 Date: 2001-10-05T23:07:00+00:00 List-Id: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote in message news:<5ee5b646.0110041038.5c321817@posting.google.com>... > mentioned before, there are known problems. The main reason for > putting sources there now is so that build and testing > procedures can be worked out. Don't expect a fully usable > public version of GNAT from these sources for a while, and Will having GNAT available as an (optional) part of the GCC source distrubution result is a significantly simpler process for building GNAT cross-compilers to target additional processor families? I'm thinking of processors such as the AMD 29050 and StrongARM that have long been supported by the GCC C compiler but not by the public versions of GNAT. Britt Snodgrass