From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f5d71,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 101b33,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid101b33,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,76126ba4351e4e94 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public From: bob@lintilla.demon.co.uk (Bob Cousins) Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java Date: 1999/01/22 Message-ID: <36a9c656.829142@news.supernews.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 435720079 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net> <36A88CBE.8A659EDA@iai.fzk.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@gxsn X-Trace: 917030193 PU3IS5UMB29CF3E88 uk25.supernews.com Organization: GXSN Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java,comp.java.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer Date: 1999-01-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In comp.arch.embedded, Dr. Hubert B. Keller wrote: >Reading a lot of the mails raised up to me the idea that > a lots of the people talking about Ada don't know > a lot about tasking especially with Ada. 95 % of people who advocate a language haven't actually used other languages they compare it against, but have only seen briefly or heard about them. In my experience C and C++ advocates are least likely to know other languages sufficently well to justify any opinions. [Removed some irrelevant groups] -- Bob Cousins, Software Engineer. http://www.lintilla.demon.co.uk/ "We demand that we may, or may not, be philosophers!"