From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,de7c66b71e353e40 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) Subject: Re: Valued procedures Date: 1999/01/21 Message-ID: <36a78374.555458@news.pacbell.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 435430849 References: <786pfu$1vb$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: typhoon-sf.pbi.net 916947924 206.170.2.142 (Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:45:24 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:45:24 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-01-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >Using Ada bindings would be much less painful and produce clearer code if you >were not forced to declare tonns of dummy variables just to ignore various >unused results. If the result is unused, why are the routines declared as function, rather than procedures? That sounds like an error in the binding.