From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7834b3688302a052
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: v025@academic.truman.edu (Chad R. Meiners)
Subject: Re: Parallel programing in Linux Cluster using Ada95
Date: 1999/01/19
Message-ID: <36a494fe.0@silver.truman.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 434537457
References: <780mng$mkj$1@news-2.news.gte.net>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
Organization: Missouri Research and Education Network
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-01-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

You might want to look at using the distributed annex instead.


In article <780mng$mkj$1@news-2.news.gte.net>, jlvojir1@gte.net says...
>
>Hi,
>    I was wondering if I use the task routines in the Ada95 programming
>language will I be able to utlize power of our beowolf Linux cluster.  This
>question is just to decide if I should learn the message passing routines or
>if I can use Ada's built-in paralizing capability and both would work
>equally.
>
>Thanks for any assistance, Please E-mail reply
>Joshua
>
>