From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d423dccf160531eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Jackie & Barry Schiff Subject: Re: GDB w/GNAT 3.11p w/NT4.0 Question Date: 1999/03/13 Message-ID: <36EA7A91.59D3A118@netspace.net.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 454433405 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <36E81651.5B91E3D3@netspace.net.au> <7cb8fc$o2f$1@cnn.Princeton.EDU> <36e9d084.0@news.pacifier.com> To: Steve Doiel X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@netspace.net.au X-Trace: otis.netspace.net.au 921296736 17571 210.15.251.141 (13 Mar 1999 03:45:36 GMT) Organization: A customer of Netspace Internet Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Mar 1999 03:45:36 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-13T03:45:36+00:00 List-Id: Steve Thanks for your reply. Just a quick question. How do you run from a console? When I type "gdb program.exe" in console window it brings up the GUI debugger and I get the same behavior. Must be a switch I give to GDB telling it not be GUI debugger? --Barry Schiff Steve Doiel wrote: > FYI: I experiece the same behaviour. My answer? I run the debugger > from a > command line in a console window. > > SteveD > >I am using it under NT 4.0, and so far am using the AdaGIDE editor > >>environment installed with it (used to use EMACS and maybe will > switch > >>again but just giving this a try). Anyhow I have a program with > text_io > >>input/output. When I go to run it under the debugger, which I do by > >>hitting the debug button inside of AdaGIDE, the output seems to get > >>correctly redirected to an MSDOS command window but it appears that > the > >>input does not. Thus the program bombs once it gets to an input > >>statement (eg. Text_io.Get_Line). Surely I must be doing something > >>wrong I just have not dug it out yet. If anybody knows the answer I > >>would surely appreciate it.