From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c6e9700a33963193
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Corey Ashford <yeroca@rocketmail.com>
Subject: Re: The future of Ada
Date: 1999/03/13
Message-ID: <36EA0FB4.54A03C2A@rocketmail.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 454477383
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <36E690FA.4B9C@sandia.gov> <36E96E42.26AD@sandia.gov>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Rational Software
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-03-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Gordon Dodrill wrote:
[snip]
> 
> Thank you for clearing up the fact that the $100M figure was
> the total for the development of Ada tools, and does not
> include developers time.
[snip]

I think you may still have misunderstood it.  $100M is not the
amount of money spent on developing Ada tools, it's how much
is spent by customers buying the tools.

- Corey