From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c6e9700a33963193 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Scott Ingram Subject: Re: The future of Ada Date: 1999/03/11 Message-ID: <36E80A74.1EB578BE@silver.jhuapl.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 453884979 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <36E690FA.4B9C@sandia.gov> <7c7coa$nvt$4@plug.news.pipex.net> <1999Mar11.080820.1@eisner> <36E7DC3C.8B322F23@silver.jhuapl.edu> <36E7E5E4.9FB37144@pwfl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@houston.jhuapl.edu X-Trace: houston.jhuapl.edu 921176693 14107 128.244.21.103 (11 Mar 1999 18:24:53 GMT) Organization: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Mar 1999 18:24:53 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-11T18:24:53+00:00 List-Id: Marin David Condic wrote: > > Yeah, but it is a 6 month slip that is completely unnecessary. The > argument that it is a risk mitigation just plain doesn't wash. You can Exactly!! -- Scott Ingram Sonar Processing and Analysis Laboratory Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory