From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,352ded3d63df97d9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Andreas Winckler Subject: Re: GNAT 3.11 worth installing Date: 1999/03/04 Message-ID: <36DE4874.9FA45B71@frqnet.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 451087544 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <36DDC9B2.7FC0B5C6@hiwaay.net> X-Accept-Language: de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Posting-Server-Note: This article has been posted on a newsserver of Xlink Internet Services. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Xlink. Please report abuses to news-support@xlink.net Organization: FREQUENTIS Network Systems GmbH Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Bruce or Tracy schrieb: > > Is GNAT 3.11 far enough better than 3.10 that it is worth installing? We used GNAT 3.11 on a Sun Sparc 5 to compile our software for X.25 communication. The software uses very intensive the Ada tasking and exception handling features. With GNAT 3.11 the software crashes uncontrolled with a segmentation fault (core dump). Don't know if this example applies to you, it's just our experience. AW -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Andreas Winckler Tel: (+49) (7541) 282 - 462 Department: MHS Fax: (+49) (7541) 282 - 299 FREQUENTIS Network Systems GmbH http://www.frqnet.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------