From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,352ded3d63df97d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Samuel T. Harris" <sam_harris@hso.link.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.11 worth installing
Date: 1999/03/03
Message-ID: <36DDD7E0.65C50606@hso.link.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 450967006
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <36DDC9B2.7FC0B5C6@hiwaay.net>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Raytheon Training Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-03-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bruce or Tracy wrote:
> 
> Is GNAT 3.11 far enough better than 3.10 that it is worth installing?
> 
> Does it come with its own debugger, or will it use bdb 3.10?
> 
> Is FNAT 3.11 compatible with FnatGraphicsPackage04?
> 
> Bruce

I am a HUGE ASIS for Ada83 fan and am well-pleased with the 3.11p
compiler and its corresponding ASIS implementation. Now I can
finally start exploring the additions to ASIS to support Ada95.

-- 
Samuel T. Harris, Principal Engineer
Raytheon, Scientific and Technical Systems
"If you can make it, We can fake it!"