From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,352ded3d63df97d9,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Bruce or Tracy Subject: GNAT 3.11 worth installing Date: 1999/03/03 Message-ID: <36DDC9B2.7FC0B5C6@hiwaay.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 450952524 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en,sv,no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Is GNAT 3.11 far enough better than 3.10 that it is worth installing? Does it come with its own debugger, or will it use bdb 3.10? Is FNAT 3.11 compatible with FnatGraphicsPackage04? Bruce