From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,184737148aef02ac X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Steve Quinlan Subject: Re: A Modest Defense of ACT (though they are big boys and can take care of themselves) Date: 1999/02/24 Message-ID: <36D41563.D8A72F6B@lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 447919171 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <78sojm$crk$1@plug.news.pipex.net> <7982p7$nll$1@plug.news.pipex.net> <87aeyv4kbg.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <79asc3$cq3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <79c2ch$j1c$1@remarQ.com> <79ckt6$rp3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7ah65p$4ag$1@remarQ.com> <36CF00DB.43DF428C@lmco.com> <7arqt6$3ef$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Lockheed-Martin Air Traffic Management Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dennison@telepath.com wrote: > {choke!} > Well, that was a well-considered response. I take it you've suggested things to ACT that they did not implement. This is of course evidence that they are unwilling to listen to suggestions.