From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f8544883f4f8ab29,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Robert T. Sagris" <robs@physics.BLAH.purdue.BLAH.edu>
Subject: Compiler implementation of speciallized needs annexes.
Date: 1999/02/24
Message-ID: <36D3A1EF.E7CA2A8C@physics.BLAH.purdue.BLAH.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 447795474
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@mozo.cc.purdue.edu
X-Trace: mozo.cc.purdue.edu 919839211 6696 128.210.59.63 (24 Feb 1999 06:53:31
 GMT)
Organization: Purdue University
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Feb 1999 06:53:31 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-24T06:53:31+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I was wondering why only GNAT implements all of the specialized needs 
annex's. All of the other vendors I looked into implement A, B
as they are required. C and D are also generally implemented by
everyone. Rational also implements G.

Is this do to a lack of customer demand for these features or is it 
something else?

I was just wondering

Robbi Sagris