From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9640b17421044f1a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Steve Quinlan <steven.quinlan@lmco.com>
Subject: Re: accesibility level problem
Date: 1999/02/21
Message-ID: <36D06F1B.9B4ED53B@lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 446819126
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <36CD206A.32D96489@systems.at> <36CDE45C.5B5E04D8@lmco.com>
 <36D06C0F.32CA8C6B@umundum.vol.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Lockheed-Martin Air Traffic Management
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

The relevant section is in the discussion of the 'access attribute (I'm guessing
cuz' GNAT won't tell us)

3.10.2(28) :
"The accessibility level of the view shall not be statically deeper than that of
access type A".