From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,32a8d58bcd92b75c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: David Botton <David@Botton.com>
Subject: Re: Win32: Using COM from Gnat
Date: 1999/02/14
Message-ID: <36C6E4B4.9B851FCE@Botton.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 444276839
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <36b1c4dc.19475234@news.origin-it.com>
 <Qc$WXmAKKXw2EwSv@jswalker.demon.co.uk> <36C1BA3B.BB2157EC@Botton.com>
 <36C256D3.933B3038@Botton.com> <01be5729$4fcf8bb0$022a6282@dieppe>
To: Pascal Obry <pascal_obry@csi.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Organization: CyberGate, Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Did you DLLs include any calls to the Win32 binding? That seems to be
where the problem starts.

I have put up the COM example, If you have the time see if you can get
it to compile and run on GNAT under Win9x.

David Botton


Pascal Obry wrote:
> 
> David Botton <David@Botton.com> a �crit dans l'article
> <36C256D3.933B3038@Botton.com>...
> > I also now have an example of creating a COM object with Ada completed,
> > but am having problems with GNATs ability to create working DLLs (or my
> > ability to convince it to do so). The Dlls work on NT, but not on my
> > Win98 machine. Any one have any ideas?
> 
> I have never tried under Windows 98 but I have some DLLs that are working
> fine under Windows 95 OSR2 and Windows NT.
> 
> Pascal.