From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2378cc5e1f5d6340 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Steven Hovater Subject: Re: Vads Greenhills conversion Date: 1999/02/13 Message-ID: <36C568CC.EA1E5D40@mediaone.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 443939493 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <36BF90B7.A1D093E7@trw.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: lwnws01.ne.mediaone.net 918906429 24.128.19.33 (Sat, 13 Feb 1999 06:47:09 EDT) Organization: Northeast Region--MediaOne MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 06:47:09 EDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Hi Jason - Why change? Is it an issue of going to Ada95? Corporate direction? Project direction? Target support? Cost? IMHO - and I'm very biased, I have to admit - VADS/Rational is a serious long-term solution. I've developed with VADS for going on 11 years now - and the new ApexCross products are Ada95 validated, and pretty darn hot. Cheers, Steve Jason Dorsett - FF wrote: > Does anybody know of any tools that would help convert a program built > with a Vads compiler into a greenhills buildable program.? -- Steven Hovater svh@rational.com Software Engineering Consultant Phone/fax:781-676-2565/2500 Rational Software Pager: 888-906-2209 83 Hartwell Ave, Lexington, MA Amateur radio: AA1YH