From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6a3ccb375568d2f6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Rod Chapman <rod@praxis-cs.co.uk>
Subject: Preelaborable address clause?
Date: 1999/02/10
Message-ID: <36C19FED.3628666A@praxis-cs.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 442833248
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Praxis plc, U.K.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Does anyone know if it's possible to construct a Pre-Elaborable
Address representation clause?

I find that

  A : Integer
  for A'Address use System.Storage_Elements.To_Address(16#00001000#);

if rejected when pragma Preelaboreate is applied to the enclosing
unit, since To_Address is not a static function (LRM 10.2.1(7))

 Thanks,  
   Rod Chapman
   Praxis Critical Systems
   rod@praxis-cs.co.uk