From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f849b,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f5d71,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public
X-Google-Thread: 101b33,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid101b33,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 146b77,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid146b77,public
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
From: "Network" <cubical@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java
Date: 1999/01/13
Message-ID: <369cfdd0.0@news.tss.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 432403020
References: <369C9AD8.85E6A79A@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.vxworks,comp.lang.java,comp.java.advocacy,comp.realtime,comp.arch.embedded,comp.object,comp.lang.java.programmer
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Date: 1999-01-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>There is a legacy code written in Ada and our customer would prefer Ada
>95. However, we became seriously concerned that there is not sufficient
>support for Ada in the commercial world.

Well, I don't know Ada so I cannot say... but from Bjarne Stroustrup's
Homepage, he obviously recommends C++ on large projects, over Ada :) <heh>

http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#Ada

-Network