From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,89d65c5ea403ba58
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: System Clock update rate of 0.055 milliseconds in DOS/Win95 and
 Ada.Calendar
Date: 1999/01/13
Message-ID: <369ce961.280816@news.pacbell.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 432220478
References: <01be3c40$f93dc120$3804fbd1@longslide>
 <36984F3F.FA6C58C3@grep.net> <77aapg$cnj$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <77hno2$8hh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: typhoon-sf.pbi.net 916253133 206.170.2.141 (Wed,
 13 Jan 1999 10:45:33 PDT)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:45:33 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-01-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Is it possible (and reasonable) under NT to dynamically vary the clock
interrupt rate?  ie, Interrupt at the soonest of (set of times various
tasks need an interrupt, 55ms) instead of always at a constant rate?