From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1b41412c7bc28c47
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: amado.alves@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <36853b3d-9af4-478f-b6ed-2263523cf1bf@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <2e9ebb23-a68b-43cf-8871-febcb173f951@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
	<b96bdd99-29ce-40a6-b9af-6f86150e019b@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.250.122.24
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218112231 31676 127.0.0.1 (7 Aug 2008 12:30:31
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:30:31 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=92.250.122.24;
	posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1;
	.NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR
	1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1501
Date: 2008-08-07T05:30:31-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> In what way is it any better than appending suffix _V to variable
> names, _P to procedures and _F to functions?

You got a good theoretical point there. My practical experience only
covers _T. Maybe _P, _F etc. do not pay off. Dunno.