From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,80c7ab786b3615ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,44b1fe5008113252
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: Steve O'Neill <steven.m.oneill@lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Ada vs. C, compiler optimization
Date: 1998/12/17
Message-ID: <367917B6.EE1CB5B8@lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 423262346
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <726s4n$g9h$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <75avbv$ehs$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Sanders, A Lockheed Martin Company
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c
Date: 1998-12-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Markus Kuhn wrote:

> From the Lovelace bibliography:
>
>   Syiek, David. 1995. "C vs. Ada: Arguing Performance Religion",
>   ACM Ada Letters, Nov/Dec 1995, pp. 67-69.
>   This paper demonstrates that Ada and C programs run at about
>   the same speed using compilers of approximately equal maturity,
>   with Ada having a slight performance edge because the Ada
>   compiler has more information to work with.
>

Is this available on-line anywhere?

TIA,
Steve O'Neill