From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,163676de35eee4e4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Roga Danar <smithm_nospam@XXX_nospam_stelnj.com>
Subject: Re: Concurrency in Ada 95
Date: 1998/12/03
Message-ID: <3666E9BD.FA1ABE08@XXX_nospam_stelnj.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 418319870
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <36545C0F.BB8483D@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news1.exit109.com 912710381 17606 208.225.73.22 (3 Dec 1998 18:39:41
 GMT)
Organization: AlphaSoft, Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: job_unspam@no.love.for.spam.alphasoft-inc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Dec 1998 18:39:41 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-12-03T18:39:41+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Is there URL where we take a look?

Bo Sanden wrote:

> Those involved with concurrency may be interested in an article by Jeff
> Carter and myself in the latest issue of IEEE Concurrency (just out)
> called "Practical use of Ada 95's concurrency features", pages 47-56.
>
> The article compares the Ada 95 and Ada 83 concurrency features based on
> an example from flexible manufacturing.
>
> Bo Sanden
> Colorado Technical University
> Colorado Springs

--