From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b5f7c3673f6a6b92
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tp@odn.de (Thomas Preymesser)
Subject: Re: Optimal Compilation Desired
Date: 1998/12/02
Message-ID: <366464fc.10225424@news.nuernberg.odn.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 417962829
References: <365B5C3D.E593F179@hiwaay.net>
Organization: ODN Onlinedienst Nordbayern GmbH
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-12-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 24 Nov 1998 19:24:13 -0600, "Anthony E. Glover"
<aeg@hiwaay.net> wrote:

>Does anyone have a script or command line that will optimally compile
>all code in a given directory, i.e. don't compile specs that have bodies
>or separates.  I have a library of reuse code that does not contain any
>kind of main and I just want to compile everything.  I currently compile
>*.ads and then *.adb, but this of course attempts to compile specs
>that don't need to be compiled.

why don't you use some sort of make-program, which will exactly
compile what must be compiled and nothing more?

-Thomas