From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,438f2856ab36a026 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) Subject: Re: 83/95 issue, bad code or compiler bug Date: 1998/11/19 Message-ID: <3654a6ad.11260227@news.pacbell.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 413671986 References: X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net 911517472 206.170.24.42 (Thu, 19 Nov 1998 15:17:52 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 15:17:52 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-11-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I recently ran into what appears to be the same problem with OA 7.1.2 and sent it in as a bug report - no response yet. It seems to be doing over-agressive optimization which is bad if you are dealing with a data structure passed to/from the outside world.