From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,163994d4f34e92d0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.90.102 with SMTP id bv6mr1480666pab.34.1344323891677;
        Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 g9ni3089241pbo.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ctu-peer!ctu-gate!news.nctu.edu.tw!usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!l5g2000vbo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: how to tell gnatmake to send executables to a different directory
 when compiling multi source?
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <365404fb-44e9-4772-856b-68d3059ed142@l5g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
References: <jv2vu5$9tm$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <5dcd485b-1d0e-4d39-bae7-71b3525716fb@googlegroups.com>
 <2e578fbe-5271-4a6a-905b-1cf4669eb5ce@v9g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
 <1eb01749-1134-4baf-9adf-19d0a2792890@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.98.68.197
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343751049 21164 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2012 16:10:49
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:10:49 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l5g2000vbo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=153.98.68.197;
 posting-account=pcLQNgkAAAD9TrXkhkIgiY6-MDtJjIlC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120509 Firefox/10.0.4,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-07-31T09:04:59-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Patrick wrote on comp.lang.ada:
> Yep, GCC looks really scary and I am sure if you want your compiler included in it, you have to do scary stuff too.
>
> What I am trying to say is that the GNAT project that Adacore is
> releasing directly to the public

*is* GCC, only a snapshot of AdaCore's branch in their version control
system.

> could have the option to build from GPR if possible and if not, it
> could fall back on Makefiles.

Double the work, no benefit.

The other projects that AdaCore release (GPS, gprbuild, etc) do use
project files extensively.

--
Ludovic Brenta.