From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bfb89d61cc46e4b3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Gautier de Montmollin <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch>
Subject: Re: What ada 83 compiler is *best*.
Date: 1998/11/18
Message-ID: <36531A3E.B51D0E43@maths.unine.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 413213199
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <72ue3m$omt@romeo.logica.co.uk> <1998Nov18.103329.1@eisner>
 <to.reply-1811980823590001@129.197.97.40>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Universite de Neuchatel
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> This is a perfect option!  Since Ada and VAX are both rotting corpses
> awaiting a dignified burial, you can spend valuable career time learning
> BOTH and become COMPLETELY unmarketable!!!

Rotting (or rotten) doesn't mean unmarketable - e.g. C++, Windows.

-- 
Gautier

BTW: I'm sure you didn't try DEC Ada...