From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c6e016ae58737f34
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: win32ada design question/problem
Date: 1998/11/18
Message-ID: <3653142f.218516@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 413225966
References: <72shhh$8cg$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <F2L2r5.9IA.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>: System.Address does not nessecarily map to a C pointer
>I would not worry about the portability of System.Address
I know at least one Intel-targetted Ada 95 compiler that uses 48 bits
for System.Address - 16 bit segment and 32 bit offset.  It may be that
it knows that pragma Interface to C means the segment is ignored and
should be tossed - I haven't had occasion to test that.